MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3113179148 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i5.1428

Life expectancy and health care utilization of individuals with dementia in Ontario, Canada: A population-level study

2020· article· en· W3113179148 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stacey Fisher, Douglas G. Manuel, Sarah Spruin, Geoffrey Anderson, Monica Taljaard, Peter Tanuseputro

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsBruyèreUniversity of TorontoOttawa Public HealthUniversity of OttawaOttawa HospitalStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaLife expectancyMedicineHealth careGerontologyAmbulatory carePopulationLong-term careInpatient careFamily medicineDiseasePsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionIt is important for dementia patients, their families and caregivers, and health planners to have an understanding of life expectancy and the likely care experience of patients from dementia diagnosis to end-of-life. Objectives and ApproachUsing administrative health data of all dementia patients in Ontario, Canada (2014 to 2017) and period life table methodology, life expectancy and average health care use and cost for individuals from dementia diagnosis to death was examined. Dementia was ascertained by a validated case ascertainment definition and information from long-term care, home care and complex continuing care assessments. Formal care was categorized as inpatient, outpatient, home care or long-term care. ResultsLife expectancy at dementia diagnosis was 8.7 years and 9.8 years for men and women diagnosed prior to age 75, of which 3.7 years (42%) and 4.7 years (49%) was spent receiving formal care, respectively. Life expectancy was 4.4 and 5.2 years for men and women diagnosed after age 75, of which 2.2 years (50%) and 3.1 years (60%) was spent receiving care, respectively. Women received proportionally more long-term and home care compared to men, while men received more inpatient and outpatient care. In the year prior to dementia diagnosis, individuals received formal care for 20 days per 100 person-days. Those at the end-of-life received care for 79 days per 100 person-days, including 55 long-term care days and 7.8 inpatient care days. Average direct health care costs from diagnosis to end-of-life was $230,000 and was higer for women and those diagnosed before age 75. ConclusionThe burden of formal care for those with dementia is substantial. The results of this study will be used by physicians to inform conversations with patients, their families and caregivers around what to expect after a dementia diagnosis, and by health care planners for population health planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.378
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data Science→Same topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues→French-language works237,207→