A Probability-Based Daytime Algorithm for Sea Fog Detection Using GOES-16 Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fog is a hazardous weather event that can endanger navigation, aviation, and transportation. While human has several limitations in detecting and forecasting offshore fog, satellite remote sensing offers cost-effective images. In this study, a probability-based daytime sea fog detection algorithm, applied to geostationary operational environmental satellite (GOES) 16 satellite data over the Grand Banks offshore Eastern Canada, is presented and compared with the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s Low Instrument Flight Rules (LIFR) probability map. Initially, clear-sky and ice cloud classes were delineated in the GOES-16 image and then the remaining pixels were assigned a fog probability by conducting small droplet proxy, spatial homogeneity, and temperature difference tests. Moreover, a green band was linearly interpolated using the first three bands of GOES-16 images to generate pseudotrue color composites. The resulting maps were evaluated both during an extended sea fog event and using several statistical measures. The average detection probability for the observed advection fog events was 66% for the proposed method, while that for NOAA's LIFR map was 38%. Furthermore, by thresholding the generated maps at the probability of 60%, the false alarm rate, probability of detection, hit rate, and Hanssen-Kuiper skill score were 0.09, 0.77, 0.83, and 0.68, respectively. The proposed method is operationally being used in this region to detect and monitor sea fog, facilitating safe navigation and aviation. This is the first study that uses GOES-16 for daytime fog detection and discusses a satellite-based solution for fog modeling in Grand Banks, NL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".