Positive Clinical Benefit on Patient Care, Quality of Life, and Symptoms After Contact Force–Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the long-term clinical benefits of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. METHODS: PRECEPT was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm Food and Drug Administration-regulated investigational device exemption clinical study. Patients were followed up to 15 months after ablation. Outcomes included use of antiarrhythmic drugs, rate of cardioversions and cardiovascular hospitalization, Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life score, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity of Atrial Fibrillation score. RESULTS: A total of 333 enrolled persistent atrial fibrillation patients underwent ablation. The cardioversion rate decreased by 83% at the 9- to 15-month follow-up. Antiarrhythmic drug utilization decreased by 69% at 12 to 15 months post-ablation. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from cardiovascular hospitalization was 84.2% (95% CI, 80.2%-88.2%) at 15 months. Consistent improvements in mean Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life composite (+50.0) were seen at 6 months, sustained at 15 months, and exceeded the minimum clinically important difference. Improvements in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life scores were significantly better among participants without documented atrial arrhythmia recurrences. By Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity of Atrial Fibrillation symptom classification, >80% of patients were asymptomatic (class 0) at 15 months post-ablation compared with only 0.7% at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation was associated with a significant decrease in antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion rate, and hospitalization. Clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life were observed in all patients. The majority of the patients (>80%) were asymptomatic at 15 months post-ablation. The positive clinical impact of improved quality of life and reduced health care utilization may help with shared decision-making in persistent atrial fibrillation treatment. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02817776.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".