Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, subjective, and thermal stress responses in midlife women with vasomotor symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dysregulated responses to experimental stress paradigms may indicate exposure to chronic stress. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are linked with diminished quality of life and psychological stress, but induced stress responsivity has received limited investigation. We examined whether women with and without VMS differ in their evoked hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, subjective, hemodynamic, and thermal stress responses. METHODS: A total of 37 midlife women (27 VMS+; 10 VMS-) completed 2 experimental stress paradigms: (1) Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST; computerized social-evaluative stressor) and (2) Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST; thermal stress task). Responses on a five-domain (range 0-50) Visual Analog Scale, salivary cortisol (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), and hemodynamic indices (blood pressure, heart rate) were measured before and after each task to compare within-person change between groups. Thermal sensitivity was assessed on the QST. RESULTS: On the MIST, the VMS+ group showed a smaller cortisol release (0.01 vs 0.07 μg/dL; P = 0.046; corresponding to 54% vs 83% increases), and subjective stress response (21.2- vs 31.1-point Visual Analog Scale increase, P = 0.05; corresponding to 2427% vs 2863% increases) but no hemodynamic difference, compared to the VMS- group. The QST did not provoke stress responses via cortisol release or subjective report, but the VMS+ group tended to perceive heat at a higher temperature (38.5°C vs 36.4°C, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Women with VMS exhibited both diminished cortisol and subjective stress responses to the MIST, and reduced thermal sensitivity on QST compared to women without VMS. Dysregulated stress responsivity provides preliminary evidence suggesting that VMS may represent a chronic stress condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".