Network‐level relationships between cortical neurodegeneration and FDG‐PET hypometabolism across clinical and A/T/N subgroups in AD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Converging evidence suggests that Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects multiple large‐scale brain networks. Determining the relationship between network‐level alterations in neuroimaging‐derived metrics of brain structure and function and whether concordance between metrics varies by clinical presentation or pathological status can increase our understanding of the disease process in AD. To this aim, we evaluated the relationship between cortical thinning (neurodegeneration) and cortical glucose hypometabolism within distributed brain networks in individuals across clinical (AD, MCI who later progress to AD, MCI who remain stable, and normal controls) and CSF‐defined A/T/N subgroups. Method T1‐MPRAGE and FDG‐PET scans were downloaded from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative website (cohorts ADNI‐1&2 at baseline only). Regional W‐score maps were computed for each patient and each imaging modality, to adjust for the effect of normal aging. Using a well‐validated atlas from the Human Connectome Project/Glasser et al. (2016) and the corresponding cortical network solution by Ji et al. (2019), network‐level Pearson correlations were computed between cortical thickness and FDG metabolism, for each participant, reflecting individual consistency in the degree of atrophy and hypometabolism at each network. Multivariate analysis of variance models assessing the effects of clinic diagnostic category and, separately, A/T/N status, on correlations while accounting for age, education and APOE‐4 status were examined. Results Among clinical diagnostic groups, atrophy‐hypometabolism correlations showed significant differences in 11 of 12 networks (Table 1), with correlations increasing by disease severity specifically within networks known to be affected by AD (e.g., frontoparietal, default mode, ventral multimodal; Figures 1 and 2). Among A/T/N subgroups, significant differences in correlation scores were found only within select networks including frontoparietal and default mode networks (Table 2; Figure 3). Conclusion With increased disease severity, cortical atrophy is increasingly related to cortical FDG hypometabolism across brain networks. In the A/T/N framework, our findings suggest that both amyloid and tau increase this structure‐function relationship. However, considerable heterogeneity was present among all A/T/N subgroups, warranting further exploration. Multimodal neuroimaging analyses can unravel the structure‐function relationships that contribute to clinical outcomes and diagnostic uncertainty in AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".