Abstract P423: Lactation Duration is Associated With Favorable Cognitive Function in Women During Midlife: The 30-year Cardia Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Lactation has been associated with lower incidence of the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and early atherosclerosis in women across the childbearing years. The lower risk of cardiometabolic diseases related to higher lifetime lactation may also extend to levels of cognitive function during midlife. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that lactation duration is associated with better cognitive function in women during midlife independent of antecedent risk factors, as well as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. Methods: We included 904 women aged 18-30 years at baseline (1985-86) enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study without no diabetes before ≥1 birth(s) after baseline, reported lactation duration for each post-baseline birth, and had 6 measures of cognitive function assessed at Year 30 (2015-16) including the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Letter Fluency Test, and Category Fluency Test. Linear regression models estimated mean (95%CI) cognition scores by lactation duration (none, >0 to 6 mos, > 6 to <12 mos, ≥12 mos) adjusted for race, age, BMI, blood pressure, parity, and follow up covariates (Table 1). Results: Among parous women (46% black, 54% white) at 30-year follow up, average age was 54 yrs and 47% had obesity, 61% delivered ≥2 births since baseline, 29% used anti-hypertensive medications and 16% developed overt diabetes. Black women were less likely to report >6 mos of total lactation for all births than white women (23% vs. 58%). Unadjusted and fully adjusted mean scores for 3 cognitive function measures had graded direct associations with increasing lactation duration; specifically, the RAVLT, MoCA and Category Fluency Test scores (all p-trend < 0.01). Conclusions: In this prospective study, longer lactation duration was associated with more favorable cognition scores among women during midlife.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".