Associations between occupational performance and quality of life, well-being, and instrumental activities of daily living in older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the associations between occupational performance and quality of life, well-being, and instrumental activities of daily living in older Japanese adults by examining the correlations between the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and other assessment instruments. We recruited 45 participants (65 years old, without dementia) from inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation services in Japan. The associations between the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as a measure of occupational performance and satisfaction and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 as a measure of the quality of life, Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale as a measure of wellbeing, and Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence as a measure of instrumental activities of daily living were examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance and satisfaction scores showed fair correlations with the physical and mental component summary scores of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (r = 0.35 and 0.45, respectively) but not with the role or social component summary scores. Both performance and satisfaction scores showed fair correlations with the total Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale score (r = 0.35 and 0.41, respectively), but not with the total Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence score. The occupational performance showed fair correlations with quality of life and well-being but not with instrumental activities of daily living in older Japanese adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".