The ANeED study: Ambroxol in new and early dementia with Lewy bodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The mechanisms by which GBA and APOE mutations result in PD or DLB are not fully understood, however there is evidence that it may be connected to reduced levels of GCase enzyme activity. CNS penetration has been confirmed for Ambroxol, and has been shown to increase glucocerebrosidase activity and protein levels in animal and human studies. One small open study with Ambroxol 420mg TID in PD for 186 days found excellent target engagement and improved motor symptoms, and a RCT with 50 PDD patients is ongoing in London, Canada. Method We will execute a national multicenter phase III RCT clinical intervention study with Ambroxol in prodromal and mild DLB in Memory Clinics in Norway. We will include persons living with prodromal (DLB‐MCI) or mild DLB with MMSE >=15 to Ambroxol or placebo. We will stratify participants based on genotypes for APOE and GBA and the CSF biomarkers A‐beta, total and phosphorylated tau protein. We will build a national trial platform for drug trials in neurodegenerative disorders in Norway and aim to include more centers in Europe for next phase studies via the European DLB Consortium (E‐DLB). We will execute a PPI program to raise awareness and reduce stigma for people living with DLB and their families. Result The ANeED‐study has received funding from the national Norwegian health authorities. Formal approvals for ethics, data protection and Medicine Agency are ongoing. We are planning a national start‐up meeting in Norway in September 2020, and we are currently building a national platform in Norway to be able to run clinical intervention studies in neurodegenerative disorders. We are building a PPI program to recruit patients and caregivers to clinical studies. Conclusion Phase III studies with Ambroxol in PD, PDD and DLB are currently being planned. APOE, GBA and GCase are central to the disease process in both PD, PDD and in DLB. Patients, carers and health providers now need to be offered participation in clinical studies also when diagnosed with one of the α‐synucleinopathies. Preliminary data find Ambroxol to be potentially disease modifying in these disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".