MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113328691 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v11n6p213

Impact of Demographic Features of Young Entrepreneurs on Financial Literacy: Meta-Analysis in Delhi NCR

2020· article· en· W3113328691 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ankur Agrawal, Mohammad Rumzi Tausif, Praveen Kumar Pandey, Prashant Kumar Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial literacyVenture capitalSubsidyGovernment (linguistics)FinanceEconomic growthFinancial managementBusinessEconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Financial literacy capability impacts individuals, families, financial institutions and the economy, as a whole. Financial knowledge is required in every aspect of life in this competitive world. The fundamental object for this analysis is to assess the impact of demographic features of budding young entrepreneurs on their financial Literacy, in the national capital reason of India. The methodology used is, the self-administered and closed-ended questions to collect the experiential data from the young entrepreneurs. Before conducting the survey, dense literature was conducted to understand the background of the concept and to find the research gap. The study reports that a young male budding entrepreneur in the age group of the '20s, started a venture or entrepreneurial activity at an early age and graduate in the field of technology, accounts, economics or management is well versed in understanding the financial implications. The socio-economic culture of India supports the results. The outcome of the study will be useful for the banks, financial institutions, venture capitalist, who involved in financing the start-ups and new ventures moreover, it is also essential for government and policymakers who gives subsidies and other support to make India as a self-reliant nation "Aatm - Nirbhar Bharat".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207