PENGARUH CHESS GAME (PERMAINAN CATUR) TERHADAP PIKIRAN NYAMAN (KOGNITIF) PADA LANSIA DEMENSIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Demensia adalah bagian dari proses neurodegeneratif yang terjadi pada usia lanjut. Demensia disebabkan oleh penurunan dalam fungsi kognitif. Melakukan permainan dapat menjadi salah satu intervensi pada demensia pada usia lanjut. Permainan catur adalah permainan yang akrab di seluruh dunia dan juga di Karanggeneng, Lamongan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh permainan catur untuk kenyamanan pikiran (kognitif) pada lansia dengan demensia. Desain yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasy eksperimental. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah lansia dengan demensia di Lamongan. Responden dalam penelitian ini 20 orang, yang terdiri 10 orang dalam kelompok intervensi dan 10 orang kelompok kontrol. Responden yang dipilih melalui multi stage random sampling. Variabel bebas adalah permainan catur, dan variabel dependen adalah pikiran nyaman (kognitif). Data dikumpulkan menggunakan Montreal Cognitive Assesment kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan Paired T-Test dan Independent T-Test dengan tingkat signifikansi α ≤ 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan selisih rerata skor kenyamanan pikiran (-0,1) pada kelompok kontrol (p = 0.758), sebaliknya terdapat selisih positif (3,2) rerata skor kenyamanan pikiran pada kelompok lansia yang melakukan permaikan catur (p = 0,001). Ada perbedaan kenyamanan pikiran (kognitif) antara kelompok intervensi dan kelompok kontrol (p = 0,008) Dapat disimpulkan bahwa intervensi chess game (permainan catur) meningkatkan pikiran nyaman (kognitif) pada lansia. Hasil penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa permainan catur dapat digunakan sebagai salah satu intervensi asuhan keperawatan untuk meningkatkan pikiran nyaman pada lansia dengan demensia. Kata-kata Kunci : Permainan Catur, pikiran nyaman, Lansia ABSTRACT Dementia is a part of neurodegenerative process that occur in elderly. Dementia caused by decrease in cognitive function. Playing game is one of activity that can be intervention for dementia in elderly. Chess game is the game that familiar in whole world and also in Karanggeneng, Lamongan. This study aim to analyze the effect of chess game to comfort mind (cognitive) at elderly with dementia. Design used in this study was quasy experimental study. Population in this study was elderly with dementia in Lamongan. The respondent in this study is 20 person, consist by 10 person in intervention group and 10 person in control group. Respondent selected through multi stage random sampling. The independent variable was chess game, and dependent variable was comfort mind (cognitive).Data were collected using MoCA-Ina questionnaires and analyzed using Paired T-Test and Independent T-Test with a significance level of α ≤ 0.05. The results showed that there was no difference in mean score difference in the comfort of mind (-0.1) in the control group (p = 0758), otherwise there is a positive difference (3, 2 ) mean score comfort of mind on elderly people who do chess game (p = 0.001). There is a difference in the comfort of mind (cognitive) between the intervention group and the control group (p = 0.008) . It can be concluded that the intervention of chess games ( increases comfort mind (cognitive) in the elderly. The results of this study suggest that the game of chess can be used as a nursing intervention to improve the mind comfortably in the elderly with dementia . Keywords: chess game, comfort mind cognitive, dementia elderly
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".