MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

20 Quantification of sBCMA in human plasma using a high-throughput mass spectrometry workflow for exploratory, CAP/CLIA or regulated studies

2020· article· en· W3113360743 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Genovesi, Michael Schirm, Gwënaël Pottiez, Rudolf Guilbaud, Lorella Di Donato

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCaprion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyMass spectrometryPeptideSelected reaction monitoringTandem mass spectrometryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Bioanalytically validated methods are needed for reliable measurement of B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in clinical samples. BCMA contributes to multiple myeloma (MM) pathophysiology and is targeted by various novel immunotherapies. Soluble BCMA (sBCMA) is a promising novel biomarker for disease monitoring and prediction. To address the need for sBCMA measurement, we developed a mass spectrometry-based assays for the quantitation of total sBCMA in plasma. <h3>Methods</h3> Immunoaffinity enrichment of sBCMA from human plasma was performed on a Agilent AssayMap Bravo platform using streptavidin cartridges. Recovered sBCMA protein was digested to peptides using trypsin, spiked with a fixed level of stable isotope labeled (SIL) peptide standard, and analyzed by multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry. The MRM assay targeted a BCMA-specific endogenous peptide used as a surrogate measure of the protein, as well as the corresponding spiked SIL peptide at known concentration. An 8-point external calibration curve was prepared by spiking varying amounts of recombinant BCMA and fixed amounts of SIL peptides in surrogate matrix. Endogenous sBCMA levels were determined by back-calculating against the curve. To assess the performance of the method, ≥ 2 precision and accuracy runs were performed. To assess the impact of ligand or drug binding on the developed assay, performance of the assay was tested using plasma spiked at a range of concentrations with rhAPRIL, rhBAFF or simulated mAb drug. <h3>Results</h3> The developed assay allowed the quantitation of sBCMA from 1 to 1000 ng/mL. The precision and accuracy at different QC levels was within 20% CV and 20% bias. The presence of binding proteins (rhAPRIL, rhBAFF, simulated mAb) did not interfere with the measurement of sBCMA indicating that the assay measures total sBCMA. <h3>Conclusions</h3> We have developed an assay for the absolute quantitation of total sBCMA in human plasma. The assay can be analytically validated and deployed for clinical studies with a ~ 3-day turnaround time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207