MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113557157 · doi:10.18280/mmep.070408

Feasibility Study of Grid-Connected PV System for Peak Demand Reduction of a Residential Building in Tehran, Iran

2020· article· en· W3113557157 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reza Alayi, M. Reyasudin Basir Khan, Mehdi Salehi Ghara Mohmammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFossil fuelRenewable energyGridPhotovoltaic systemEnvironmental economicsAutomotive engineeringCapital costBattery (electricity)Environmental scienceEnergy storageComputer scienceReliability engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringEconomicsPower (physics)Waste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of fossil fuels for energy demand is overgrowing, leading to a higher CO2 emission. Besides, these resources have fluctuating prices and have higher operating costs. Thus, the integration of renewable energy (RE) sources has been increasing throughout the years to reduce the dependency on fossil fuel generation. However, RE generations have high initial costs and intermittent resources. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct technical and economic analysis before the installation of any hybrid energy systems. This study proposes the installation of a PV system for a residential building in Tehran, Iran. The goal of the system is to have a PV system for peak demand reduction. Moreover, the input data also includes economic parameters such as costs of PV, battery, and grid purchases alongside interest rates. Sensitivity analysis also conducted in this study to investigate the variation of load profiles on the optimal system configuration. The simulation results show a 422-kW grid-connected PV system with battery storage is the most optimal system for the selected location. The system has a lower Net Present Cost (NPC) and initial capital compared to other configurations. Moreover, the system also has a higher RE generation and lower energy import from the grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207