MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113720378 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02141357mtgabs

On the Influence of Hydrocarbon Precursors and Elemental Composition on the Dielectric Properties and Conduction Mechanism of Hydrogenated Silicon Carbonitride Thin Films

2020· article· en· W3113720378 on OpenAlexaff
Aysegul Abdelal, Zahra Khatami, Allen Abishek, Peter Mascher

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThin filmPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionSiliconDielectricSilicon oxideChemical vapor depositionSilicon nitrideCarbon filmChemical engineeringNanotechnologyOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ternary compound thin films have drawn interest since intermediate forms can be developed for materials with tunable properties. Among them, thin films of silicon carbonitride (SiCN) are widely used for protective hard coatings due to their superior mechanical and chemical properties such as high wear resistance, chemical and thermal stability at high temperatures, and hardness. Another area of application of SiCN thin films is as low dielectric constant materials, which are desired for replacing silicon oxide (SiO 2 ) or silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ) in integrated circuits (IC) and charge trapping capacitors. In general, SiCN is an intermediate compound between Si 3 N 4 which is a highly transparent, wide band gap (5 eV) dielectric, and silicon carbide (SiC) with high mechanical durability [1]. One of the most common techniques for the fabrication of SiCN thin films is plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) with alkylsilazane precursors for high composition control [2]. Recently, we reported the compositional and mechanical properties of SiCN:H thin films, which were deposited using electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) PECVD with two different hydrocarbon precursors, acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) [3, 4]. In the present work, we explore how film composition affects the electrical behaviour of the thin films. More specifically, we investigate the dielectric properties of SiCN:H thin films and the charge transportation and trapping mechanisms for different stoichiometries and film densities, as a function of the hydrocarbon precursor. Metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) capacitor type structures were formed on p-type (100) silicon substrates. Following the deposition, aluminum (Al) gate electrodes were sputtered for current-voltage (I-V) and capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements operated at 1 MHz. The results were correlated with composition and density of SiCN:H thin films obtained from Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS), elastic recoil detection (ERD), and variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) measurements. Finally, finite element modeling was performed by COMSOL to compare the capacitance characteristics in MIS structures of the thin films. [1] L.C Chen, C.K. Chen, S.L Wei, D.M Bhusari, K.H. Chen, Y.F. Chen, Y.C. Jong and Y.S. Huang. Crystalline silicon carbon nitride: A wide band gap semiconductor. Applied Physics Letters, 72(19), pp.2463-2465 (1998). [2] S. Bulou, L. Le Brizoual, P. Miska, L. de Poucques, R. Hugon, M. Belmahi, J. Bougdira. The influence of CH4 addition on composition, structure and optical characteristics of SiCN thin films deposited in a CH4/N2/Ar/hexamethyldisilazane microwave plasma. Thin Solid Films, 520(1), 245-250 (2011). [3] A. Abdelal, Z. Khatami and P. Mascher. Influence of Different Carbon Precursors on Optical and Electrical Properties of Silicon Carbonitride Thin Films. ECS Transactions, 97(2), 59 (2020). [4] Z. Khatami, G. B. F. Bosco, J. Wojcik, T. R. Tessler, P. Mascher. Influence of Deposition Conditions on the Characteristics of Luminescent Silicon Carbonitride Thin Films. ECS Journal of Solid-State Science and Technology, 7(2), N7 (2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207