MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3113763351 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.20.423696

Cross-covariance isolate detect: a new change-point method for estimating dynamic functional connectivity

2020· preprint· en· W3113763351 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Anastasiou, Ivor Cribben, Piotr Fryźlewicz

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovarianceComputer scienceChange detectionSliding window protocolDynamic functional connectivityA priori and a posterioriResting state fMRIPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceData pointTask (project management)Data miningWindow (computing)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Evidence of the non stationary behavior of functional connectivity (FC) networks has been observed in task based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments and even prominently in resting state fMRI data. This has led to the development of several new statistical methods for estimating this time-varying connectivity, with the majority of the methods utilizing a sliding window approach. While computationally feasible, the sliding window approach has several limitations. In this paper, we circumvent the sliding window, by introducing a statistical method that finds change-points in FC networks where the number and location of change-points are unknown a priori. The new method, called cross-covariance isolate detect (CCID), detects multiple change-points in the second-order (cross-covariance or network) structure of multivariate, possibly high-dimensional time series. CCID allows for change-point detection in the presence of frequent changes of possibly small magnitudes, can assign change-points to one or multiple brain regions, and is computationally fast. In addition, CCID is particularly suited to task based data, where the subject alternates between task and rest, as it firstly attempts isolation of each of the change-points within subintervals, and secondly their detection therein. Furthermore, we also propose a new information criterion for CCID to identify the change-points. We apply CCID to several simulated data sets and to task based and resting state fMRI data and compare it to recent change-point methods. CCID may also be applicable to electroencephalography (EEG), magentoencephalography (MEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) data. Similar to other biological networks, understanding the complex network organization and functional dynamics of the brain can lead to profound clinical implications. Finally, the R package ccid implementing the method from the paper is available from CRAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→