NBIHT: An Efficient Algorithm for 1-Bit Compressed Sensing With Optimal Error Decay Rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The <i>Binary Iterative Hard Thresholding</i> (BIHT) algorithm is a popular reconstruction method for one-bit compressed sensing due to its simplicity and fast empirical convergence. Despite considerable research on this algorithm, a theoretical understanding of the corresponding approximation error and convergence rate still remains an open problem. This paper shows that the normalized version of BIHT (NBIHT) achieves an approximation error rate optimal up to logarithmic factors. More precisely, using <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m$ </tex-math></inline-formula> one-bit measurements of an <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$s$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-sparse vector <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$x$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, we prove that the approximation error of NBIHT is of order <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O \left ({\frac{1 }{ m }}\right)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> up to logarithmic factors, which matches the information-theoretic lower bound <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\Omega \left ({\frac{1 }{ m }}\right)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> proved by Jacques, Laska, Boufounos, and Baraniuk in 2013. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical analysis of a BIHT-type algorithm that explains the optimal rate of error decay empirically observed in the literature. This also makes NBIHT the first provable computationally-efficient one-bit compressed sensing algorithm that breaks the inverse square-root error decay rate <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O \left ({\frac{1 }{ m^{1/2} }}\right)\vphantom {{\left ({\frac{1 }{ m^{1/2} }}\right)}^{'}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".