MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3113784974 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-448

Subduction of a rifted passive continental margin: the Pohorje case of Eastern Alps - constraints from geochronology and geochemistry

2020· article· en· W3113784974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruihong Chang, Franz Neubauer, Johann Genser, Yongjiang Liu, Sihua Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryEclogiteMetamorphismZirconSubductionContinental crustGeochronologyGneissMetamorphic rockOceanic crustCrustPetrologyContinental marginPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A-type subduction is considered to occur at the final stage of continent-continent collision. In many cases, the UHP/HP metamorphic conditions are well known but data on the type of subducted continental crust is lacking. In terms of end members, the type of subducted crust is either (1) normal thick continental crust or (2) the crust from the center of a rift zone, which is influenced by strong extension, high-temperature metamorphism due to thinning of even the continental mantle lithosphere and strong magmatism. To resolve these alternative scenarios, we investigated the southernmost part of the Eclogite-Gneiss Unit (EGU) of Cretaceous metamorphic age exposed in the Pohorje Mountains in Eastern Alps. There, UHP eclogites and ultramafic mantle rocks are exposed in a matrix of paragneiss and hitherto undated granitic orthogneises (Kirst et al., 2010). This study presents, for the first time, geochronological and geochemical data from newly discovered Permian granitic orthogneisses in this area. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb ages of the orthogneisses are 255±2.2 Ma and 260±0.81 Ma, which are interpreted as the age of zircon crystallization in a magma. In contrast, all rounded zircons from paragneissic rocks give Cretaceous ages (89.34±0.69 Ma and 90.8±1.2 Ma), considered as the age of UHP/HP metamorphism. These zircons overgrew older zircons of Permian and rare older ages tentatively indicating that the metasedimentary could be not older than latest Permian. Zircon εHf(t) values of the four ortho- and paragneisses with (176Hf/177Hf) initial from 0.282201 to 0.282562, TDM2 are Proterozoic (1390~1970 Ma). The granitic orthogneisses show the geochemical features (high (La/Lu) N ratios (160.3–307.3), strong negative Eu anomalies) of an evolved granite molten from continental crust. This type of orthogneisses could be considered as the source magma of seemingly rootless Late Permian to Triassic pegmatites (Knoll et al., 2018) widespread within the EGU further to the north. The paragneisses are heterogeneously composed and are associated with eclogites and ultramafic cumulates of oceanic affinity (De Hoog et al., 2011). We argue that the Permian granitic orthogneisses might be derived from partial melting of lower crust in a rift zone. We consider, therefore, this segment of the EGU as part of the distal Late Permian rift zone, which finally led to the opening of the Meliata Ocean during Middle Triassic times. If true, the new data also imply that the stretched continental crust was potentially not much wider than ca. 100 km, was subducted and then rapidly exhumed during early Late Cretaceous times. References De Hoog, J.C.M., Janák, M., Vrabec, M., Hatton, K.H., 2011. In: Dobrzhinetskaya, L., Faryad, S.W., Wallis, S., Cuthbert, S. (Eds.), Ultrahigh-pressure Metamorphism: 25 Years After the Discovery of Coesite and Diamond. Elsevier Insights, pp. 399–439. Janák, M., Froitzheim, N., Yoshida, K., Sasinková, V., Nosko, M., Kobayashi, T., Hirajima, T., Vrabec, M., 2015. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 33, 495–512. Kirst, F., Sandmann. S., Nagel. T., et al. 2010. Geologica Carpathica 61(6), 451-461. Knoll, T., Schuster, R., Huet, B., Mali, H., Onuk, P., Horschinegg, M., Ertl, A., Giester, G., 2018. Canadian Mineralogist 56, 489-528.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→