MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Corneal laser procedure for vision improvement in patients with late stage dry age-related macular degeneration - a retrospective observational cohort study

2020· preprint· en· W3113943197 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond Stein, Samuel N. Markowitz, Michael J. Berry, Michael J. Berry

Bibliographic record

VenueF1000Research · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyVisual acuity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Purpose</ns3:underline> : To determine the safety and efficacy of corneal photovitrification (CPV), a new corneal laser procedure, for vision improvement in patients with late stage dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Design</ns3:underline> : Retrospective observational cohort study </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Participants</ns3:underline> : 32 eyes of 17 patients with late stage dry AMD; each eye received a single CPV corneal laser procedure and had 12 months (12m) post-treatment (Tx) follow-up. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Methods</ns3:underline> : Pre- and post-Tx examinations included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, subjective manifest refraction, best corrected distance and near visual acuity (BCDVA and BCNVA), and potential visual acuity (PVA). Additional examinations including contrast sensitivity (CS), corneal topography (CT), ray tracing aberrometry (RTA) and microperimetry (MP) were obtained for a subgroup (n=12) of eyes. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Main Outcome Measures</ns3:underline> : BCDVA, BCNVA, PVA, CS, CT, RTA and MP measurements </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Results</ns3:underline> : <ns3:underline>Safety</ns3:underline> – There were no complications or adverse events. <ns3:underline>Efficacy</ns3:underline> – Mean (± SD) BCDVA improved significantly (p &lt; 0.004) from 20/238 (1.08 logMAR) at baseline to 20/144 (0.86 logMAR) at 12m post-Tx corresponding to 11.0 (± 13.1) letters gained. Mean contrast sensitivity improved significantly (p &lt; 0.05) by a factor of 1.86 from baseline at 12m post-Tx. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:underline>Conclusions</ns3:underline> : Subject to the limitation of a small sample size, this pilot study indicates that the CPV corneal laser procedure is safe and efficacious for vision improvement in patients with late stage dry AMD. The CPV Tx mechanism of action involves retinal irradiance distribution modifications that may stimulate patient use of functional, rather than atrophied, retinal regions. </ns3:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueF1000ResearchSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207