ARCHITECTURE OF THE INTELLECTUAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TO SUPPORT EXPERT DECISIONS ON STRATEGIC INNOVATIVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассмотрены методы построения интеллектуальной информационной системы для поддержки экспертных решений по стратегическому инновационному развитию энергетики. Обоснована необходимость применения методов анализа Больших данных (Big Data). Представлена архитектура интегрированного хранилища интеллектуальной информационной системы, основным компонентом которой является система онтологий, объединяющая данные и знания из различных источников. The article discusses methods of building an intelligent information system to support expert decisions on strategic innovative development of the energy sector. The necessity of using Big Data analysis methods has been substantiated. Architecture of an integrated repository of an intelligent information system is presented, in which the main component is a system of ontologies on the basis of which information, data and knowledge from various sources are combined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it