MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Bulk inclusion dating: a geochronological tool to date low-grade metamorphism

2020· article· en· W3114038128 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne Sophie Hollinetz, David Schneider, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, Benjamin Huet, Bernhard Grasemann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMetamorphic rockMetamorphismGeochemistryGeothermobarometryMuscoviteZirconGeochronologyStauroliteSchistQuartzPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The petrologic evolution of low-grade metamorphic rocks is essential for a coherent understanding of subduction- and exhumation-related processes during collisional orogeny. Retrieving useful P-T-t-d data from low-grade metamorphic units however is challenging as these rocks commonly lack suitable target minerals for geothermobarometry and/or geochronology. Herein we introduce a new geochronological method termed ‘bulk inclusion dating’ and present an example of a rock sampled at the base of the Stauffen-Höllengebirge Nappe (Austroalpine Unit, Eastern Alps, Austria) that witnessed an Eo-Alpine tectono-metamorphic event in the Late Cretaceous. The investigated schist contains mm-scale chloritoid porphyroblasts in a foliated matrix consisting of chlorite, muscovite and quartz. Accessory minerals include ilmenite, hematite, rutile, zoned epidote with REE-rich cores, euhedral apatite and zircon. Thermodynamic modeling in the MnCNKFMASHTO system predicts the stability of the equilibrium assemblage in a narrow P-T field between 450–490°C and 5–7 kbar. Ilmenite, rutile and hematite inclusions in chloritoid cores indicate porphyroblast growth within this field, which is consistent with the observed chemical zoning of the chloritoid. The interpreted peak P-T conditions agree with the observation of garnet in a sample from the same outcrop and independent peak temperature constraints around 490°C derived from Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous material. Detailed petrographic investigations using high-resolution SEM imaging combined with EDX analysis revealed abundant minute (100 nm – 3 µm), idiomorphic zircons both included in chloritoid porphyroblasts and in the matrix. In the chloritoid rim, zircon comprises >95% of the inclusionary phases. Based on grain size distribution, we interpret zircon growth during prograde metamorphism via dissolution-precipitation mechanism and progressive coarsening due to Ostwald ripening. In situ laser ablation ICP-MS analysis of the bulk zircon population included in the chloritoid rim using a 120 µm spot size yields a U-Pb age of 116.7 ± 6.4 Ma (MSWD: 1.5; n: 79). Combined with the results of thermodynamic forward modeling, we link the age to the late prograde part of the P-T evolution. The latest synorogenic sediments on top of the Stauffen-Höllengebirge Nappe were deposited at ca. 120 Ma, giving a consistent upper bound the late prograde age. An apatite U-Pb age from the same sample yields 429.3 ± 14.6 Ma (MSWD: 1.2; n: 60). Considering the protolith is an altered tuff and the apatite is likely magmatic, a Devonian protolith age is inferred. That the apatite age was not reset during Eo-Alpine metamorphism is in agreement with the inferred metamorphic conditions. We emphasize that the strength of the bulk inclusion dating approach lies in the improved link of P-T and age data and its relative ease of application compared to other geochronological methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→