MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114066668 · doi:10.1111/jcpt.13340

Pregnancy outcomes in female patients exposed to cyclosporin‐based versus tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimens after liver/kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021· review· en· W3114066668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaojiao Gong, Jingjie Li, Jiajia Yan, Rui Dai, Longshan Liu, Pan Chen, Xiao Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYoung Teacher Foundation of Sun Yat-sen UniversityBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsMedicineTacrolimusOdds ratioPregnancyGestational diabetesKidney transplantationLiver transplantationTransplantationInternal medicineGestational ageCaesarean sectionObstetricsSurgeryGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy after transplantation is a challenge owing to the high risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes, and immunosuppressants may further impact these outcomes. There are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials comparing influences of cyclosporin and tacrolimus on pregnancy outcomes. Thus, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed observational studies assessing the comparative influences of these two drugs on pregnancy outcomes in liver/kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Relevant studies comparing pregnancy outcomes with tacrolimus and cyclosporin head-to-head were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science (from 1 January 2000 to 20 March 2020). The weighted mean difference and odds ratio (OR) were calculated to compare continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was estimated using funnel plots. The study quality was assessed according to the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall, 10 observational studies of low quality, including a total of 1080 post-liver or kidney transplant pregnancies, were identified. Tacrolimus-treated recipients experienced a lower risk of gestational hypertension (28.0%; OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.27-2.39; p < 0.01). Cyclosporin-treated recipients showed a lower incidence of caesarean section (40.3%; OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82; p < 0.01). Additionally, cyclosporin performed better in terms of the live birth rate (78.0%; OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88; p = 0.04). No significant differences in the incidences of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and birth weight were observed. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus performed better in patients with gestational hypertension, while cyclosporin was associated with a lower incidence of caesarean section and a higher incidence of live birth. The findings are based on relatively low-quality evidence, but may provide a reference for clinicians in their clinical monitoring and obstetric care for post-transplant pregnancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Pharmacy and TherapeuticsSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207