Калмыцко-тибетские отношения во второй четверти XVIII века: историографический аспект
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses the historiographic aspect of the KalmykTibetan relationships in the second quarter of the XVIII century. There were several significant events in the given period including the arrival to Kalmykia from Tibet of Shakur-lama who was chosen as the supreme lama of the KalmykBuddhists, the sending of the Kalmyk envoys to Tibet in 1729–1735 and in 1737, the giving of the ‘khanate’ muniment to the governor Tseren-Donduk by DalaiLama VII. The article analyzes the author’s publications of the last decade that made a great contribution to the topic research. There are several new significant works on the historiography of Kalmyk-Tibetan relationships including theses and monographs. Among the contemporary research there should be mentioned works of A. A. Kurapov, A. V. Tsuryumov, B. U. Kitinov and E. P. Bakaeva who managed to introduce a great number of unknown before sources on different languages. The further study of the history of the Kalmyk-Tibetan relationships that are relevant nowadays appears to be a high-potential field in the Mongolian Studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".