Semiparametric analysis of interval‐censored failure time data with outcome‐dependent observation schemes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disease progression is often monitored by intermittent follow‐up “visits” in longitudinal cohort studies, resulting in interval‐censored failure time outcomes. Furthermore, the timing and frequency of visits is often found related to a person's history of disease‐related variables in practice. This article develops a semiparametric estimation approach using weighted binomial regression and a kernel smoother to analyze interval‐censored failure time data. Visit times are allowed to be subject‐specific and outcome‐dependent. We consider a collection of widely used semiparametric regression models, including additive hazards and linear transformation models. For additive hazards models, the nonparametric component has a closed‐form estimator and the estimators of regression coefficients are shown to be asymptotically multivariate normal with sandwich‐type covariance matrices. Simulations are conducted to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators. A data set from the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Cohort Study is used to illustrate the proposed methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.066 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".