MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114352267 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24015

Biodegradation of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics by bacterial communities from activated sludge

2020· article· en· W3114352267 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Patricia Torena, Manuel Alvarez‐Cuenca, Maryam Reza

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsAecom (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRyerson University
KeywordsBiodegradationPolyethylene terephthalateMicroplasticsBacillus cereusActivated sludgeChemistryEnvironmental chemistryFood sciencePolyethylenePulp and paper industryWaste managementBacteriaEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringSewage treatmentMaterials scienceBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The emerging accumulation of microplastics (MPs) in global waters is of increasing concern and it is posing great health risks to both humans and aquatic species, yet suitable technologies to remove MPs are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate activated sludge as a source of promising biocatalysts for the removal of MPs in water. Bacterial communities in activated sludge were first screened for their potential to degrade hydrolyzable plastics from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) pre‐treated at 100°C for 1 hour. The consortium grew on a mineral medium with PET MPs as the sole carbon and energy source. To further assess its degrading potential, the consortium was put through a standardized CO 2 evolution test at a temperature of 30°C, pH 7‐7.5, reactor residence time 168 days, and PET concentration of 2.63 g/L. The biodegradation extent was further validated through assessment of morphological/structural changes on the PET by means of SEM, DSC, FTIR, and viscometry analyses. Upon incubation, the consortium degraded 17% of PET. The molecular weight remained unchanged, reflecting a degradation via surface erosion. Furthermore, the biodegradation was significantly enhanced at high oxygen flow rates. Two bacterial strains within the consortium were isolated and identified as Bacillus cereus SEHD031MH and Agromyces mediolanus PNP3. Both strains thrived when individually cultured with PET while only B. cereus showed enzymatic activity during a clear‐zone test. The examined bacterial strains possess a promising PET‐degrading activity that can be further investigated and applied to the elimination of MPs water/wastewater through innovative and effective technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207