AKSEPTABILITAS MASYARAKAT TERHADAP RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN PLTN (STUDI PADA MASYARAKAT DESA SEBAGIN KABUPATEN BANGKA SELATAN DAN DESA AIR PUTIH KABUPATEN BANGKA BARAT)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Society is an element that will receive the impact of changes that will occur in the environment. Acceptability is public acceptance of a change that will occur. In recent years, Bangka Belitung Archipelago has been selected as potential sites for PLTN Development Plan, especially on Bangka Island, namely Sebagin Village, South Bangka and Air Putih Village, West Bangka. The purpose of this study is to determine the community's acceptability of the PLTN development plan in Sebagin Village, West Bangka and Air Putih Village, West Bangka. This study uses theories, namely McLeod and Chaffee's Co-Orientation Theory which explains that there is a dynamic. This research used descriptive quantitative descriptive approaches. The primary data source is from a questionnaire with a total of 79 respondents, divided into 40 people in Sebagin Village and 39 people in Air Putih Village. The main finding in this study is to explain the community's acceptability of the PLTN development plan. In addition, it was also found the role of the elite and the mass media in the community's acceptance of the PLTN development plan in Sebagin Village, South Bangka and Air Putih Village, West Bangka. Keywords: Society, Acceptability, PLTN Development Plan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".