MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3114543936 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-023641mtgabs

MLi<sub>2</sub>Ti<sub>6</sub>O<sub>14</sub> (M = 2Na, Sr, Ba, Pb) Titanate Anodes for Lithium-Ion Capacitors (LICs)

2020· article· en· W3114543936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anshuman Chaupatnaik, Eldho Edison, Rodney Chua, Madhavi Srinivasan, Prabeer Barpanda

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrookiteMaterials scienceSpinelLithium (medication)Orthorhombic crystal systemRutileAnatasePerovskite (structure)CrystallographyTitanateChemical engineeringChemistryCrystal structureMetallurgyPhotocatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presence of shared edge, particularly of shared face, decreases the stability of ionic structures, for e.g., the least number of [TiO₆] shared edges (two) makes rutile (hcp) the most stable TiO₂ polymorph (Pauling’s IIIrd rule) [1]. Further, on insertion of (one or three) Li into spinel LiTi₂O₄ (ccp) or Li-substituted defect-spinel Li₄Ti₅O₁₂ (LTO), Li in 8a [LiO₄] sites migrate along with incoming Li to vacant 16c [LiO₆] sites, effectively avoiding face sharing of [TiO₆]-[TiO₆], [LiO₆]-[TiO₆] or [LiO₄]-[TiO₆] polyhedra in the intermediate states. This is unlike the face shared polyhedra that form mid-way during lithium insertion in case of rutile (hcp), brookite (hcp/ccp) or anatase (ccp) [2]. A unique zero-strain two-phase separation occurs favourably at a 1.5 V flat Ti(IV)/Ti(III) redox voltage vs Li, which is far above the deposition potential of lithium. This makes LTO a safe, dendrite-free, high-power, and long-life anode that is widely used commercially (Altair Nano, Toshiba SCiB, Yinlong) as an alternative to graphite. LTO is also reported (Hydro Quebec) to cycle over 30000 times vs LiFePO₄ while retaining 90% capacity. Along these lines, orthorhombic Cmca MLi₂Ti₆O₁₄ (MLTO) (M = 2Na, Sr, Ba, Pb) [3-5] prepared by rapid combustion-synthesis exhibit similar voltage (1.3-1.45 V) and capacity (100-160 mAh/g, upto 4 Li uptake). The first reported compound in this family, BaLi₂Ti₆O₁₄, had a high ionic conductivity (10-3 S/cm, 300ᵒC) and was found by serendipity during attempts to stabilize - a high-temperature type-III superionic Ramsdellite phase (MnO₂) of Li₂Ti₃O₇ - by addition of Ba [6]. Ramsdellite crystallizes in a rutile-type arrangement of 2X1 [TiO₆] polyhedras and reversibly inserts 2.24 Li [7]. Lithium diffusivity - migration pathways, their temperature dependent activation energies and diffusion coefficient - in MLTO was probed using a combination of methods involving bond valence site energy (BVSE) analysis, AC bulk-conductivity analysis, and electrochemistry versus Li was demonstrated. Further, motivated by Amatucci’s pioneering work on high power LTO/Activated Carbon (AC) asymmetric lithium-ion capacitors (LIC) showing electrochemical performance between high-energy battery and high-power capacitors, we employed MLTO electrodes in LICs for the first time. MLTOs were first loaded with lithium (pre-discharged) before assembling them in MLTOs/AC LIC hybrids. AC cathode adsorbs PF6 - ions rapidly in a capacitor-like sloped profile (40 mAh/g) at a higher voltage, while MLTOs (de)intercalate Li (100 mAh/g, 1-2 V) at Ti-redox potential. References: [1] L. Pauling, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1929, 51, 1010-1026 [2] D.W. Murphy et. al., Solid State Ionics, 1983, 9, 413-417 [3] A. Chaupatnaik, P. Barpanda, J. Mater. Res., 2018, 34, 158-168 [4] A. Dayamani, G. Shinde, A. Chaupatnaik, et.al., J. Power Sources, 2018, 385, 122-129 [5] A. Chaupatnaik, P. Barpanda, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2019, 166, A5122-A5130 [6] W.J. Zheng et. al., Solid State Ionics, 1989, 35, 235-239 [7] M.E. Arroyo y de Dompablo et. al., Mater. Res. Bull., 1997, 32, 993-1001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→