Bibliographic record
Abstract
The family is an important value for women in the hierarchy of the axiological system. The model of a traditional family where the father works professionally and the mother brings up the children is a thing of the past. There is a significant increase in the employment of women (including wives and mothers) not only because of economic needs. They also have aspirations to achieve a professional career. The aim of the study was to find out the views of women (female students) in the area of their future professional and family lives. The research adopted the method of a diagnostic survey, including the survey and interview technique. 142 women (female students) took part in the research which was conducted in the Łódź region in the first quarter of 2019. The study results prove that family and work, including professional career, are of equal values for the surveyed women. Their structure of their future family will be formed with one or two children. Most of the surveyed women from urban environments (19.2%) as compared to rural environments (12.5%) want to achieve success at work, including a professional career, in their future lives. The above-mentioned components in the future life of the surveyed women in the form of the structure of their family, work and professional career allow for the formulation of a view on the further transformation of a family life model in its functions, structure and social parenting roles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".