MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3114641081 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.28.424606

The comprehensive roadmaps of reprogramming and transformation unveiled antagonistic roles for bHLH transcription factors in the control of cellular plasticity

2020· preprint· en· W3114641081 on OpenAlexaff
Aurélia Huyghe, Giacomo Furlan, Jan Schröder, J. Stüder, F. Mugnier, L. De Matteo, J. Wang, Yong Yu, Nicolas Rama, Benjamin Gibert, Pauline Wajda, Isabelle Goddard, Nicolas Gadot, Marie Brevet, Maha Siouda, Peter Mulligan, R. Dante, P. Liu, Hinrich Gronemeyer, Marco Antonio Mendoza-Parra, José M. Polo, Fabrice Lavial

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprogrammingInduced pluripotent stem cellBiologyKLF4SOX2Transcription factorTranscriptomeTransdifferentiationCell biologyEpigenomicsComputational biologyGeneticsEmbryonic stem cellCellStem cellGene expressionGeneDNA methylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coordinated changes of cellular identity and plasticity are critical for pluripotent reprogramming (PR) and malignant transformation (MT). However, the molecular circuitries orchestrating these modifications, as well as their degree of analogy during reprogramming and transformation, remain unknown. To address this question, we generated “repro-transformable” mice models and dissected comparatively the early events underpinning PR - mediated by Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc - and MT - triggered by oncogenic Ras and c-Myc. Transcriptomic analyses allowed the identification of a unique set of markers - the cell surface glycoprotein Thy1 and the transcription factor (TF) Bcl11b - that are commonly downregulated during PR and MT and delineate cellular intermediates (CI) highly amenable to generate pluripotent or malignant derivatives. Comprehensive transcriptomic, epigenomic and functional analyses of different CI, prone or refractory to PR/MT, unveiled that cellular plasticity acquisition precedes the broad extinction of cellular identity. It also demonstrated the existence of specific and shared molecular features of PR and MT while ensuring the identification of broad-range regulators of cellular plasticity. As a proof-of-concept, we revealed that the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) class A TF Atoh8 constrains rodent and human iPS cells generation as well as MT and direct neuron conversion. Mechanistically, this TF hampers the reactivation of the pluripotent network during PR and limits the acquisition of phenotypic plasticity during MT. Furthermore, an integrated analysis of Atoh8 genome-wide binding, alongside the other bHLH TFs c-Myc, Ascl1 and MyoD promoting reprogramming/transdifferentiation, unveiled how Atoh8 constrains cellular plasticity by occupying a specific subset of MEF enhancers and by finetuning WNT signalling activity. Collectively, by deconvoluting the early steps of the reprogramming and transformation roadmaps, this integrated study uncoupled changes of cellular plasticity and identity to shed light on novel insights into reprogramming and cancer biology. Graphical abstract One-sentence summary Comparative roadmaps of cellular plasticity acquisition during pluripotent reprogramming and malignant transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPluripotent Stem Cells Research→French-language works237,207→