MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114885141 · doi:10.1142/s0218348x21500791

OPTIMAL CONTROL OF NONLINEAR TIME-DELAY FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH DICKSON POLYNOMIALS

2020· article· en· W3114885141 on OpenAlexaff
Shubo Chen, Samaneh Soradi‐Zeid, Maryam Alipour, Yu‐Ming Chu, J. F. Gómez‐Aguilar, Hadi Jahanshahi

Bibliographic record

VenueFractals · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConvergence (economics)DiscretizationNonlinear systemCollocation (remote sensing)Context (archaeology)Algebraic equationOptimal controlDelay differential equationApplied mathematicsBasis (linear algebra)Basis functionSet (abstract data type)Fractional calculusMathematical optimizationDifferential equationComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel direct scheme to solve a set of time-delay fractional optimal control problems is introduced. The method firstly uses a set of Dickson polynomials as basis functions to approximate the states and control variables of the system. Next, the context of these basis functions and the use of a collocation method allow to transform the problem into a system of nonlinear algebraic equations. Finally, the unknown coefficients and control parameters in the original problem can be easily estimated by resolving the new system of equations. Given the high efficiency of the Dickson polynomials to deal with time-delay fractional systems, the proposed strategy involves a very tunable framework for direct trajectory optimization, according to the discretization procedure and the range of arbitrary nodes. The convergence analysis of the proposed method is presented, along with some illustrative examples which demonstrate its most relevant features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFractalsSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207