MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115241014 · doi:10.1002/uog.23576

Prenatal features of ductus arteriosus‐related branch pulmonary stenosis in fetal pulmonary atresia

2020· article· en· W3115241014 on OpenAlexaff
Deliwe P. Ngwezi, Marisha McClean, Angela McBrien, Luke Eckersley, Jayani Abeysekera, Timothy Colen, Lisa K. Hornberger

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalChildren’s Health Research InstituteWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuctus arteriosusPulmonary atresiaFetusStenosisCardiologyInternal medicinePulmonary arteryPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Ductus arteriosus (DA)-related branch pulmonary stenosis (PS), due to ductal tissue migration into the proximal pulmonary artery (PA) ipsilateral to the DA, is common in newborns with pulmonary atresia (PAtr) and contributes significantly to their mortality and morbidity. We sought to define fetal echocardiographic predictors of DA-PS in PAtr. METHODS: This was a study of all neonates diagnosed prenatally with PAtr and a DA-dependent pulmonary circulation, with a DA that joined the underbelly of the arch, who had undergone surgical or catheter intervention in our hospital between 2009 and 2018. The postnatal echocardiograms and clinical records were reviewed to confirm the presence or absence of DA-PS based on the need for angioplasty at initial intervention and/or development of proximal PA stenosis post intervention. Fetal echocardiograms were examined for the features of DA-PS. RESULTS: Of 53 fetuses with PAtr, 34 (64%) had analyzable images, including 20/34 (59%) with and 14/34 (41%) without DA-PS. An inability to visualize the branch PAs in the same plane, largely associated with abnormal DA insertion into the ipsilateral PA (85% of cases), had sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 75%, 100%, 100% and 74%, respectively, for the prediction of postnatal DA-PS. The mean branch PA posterior bifurcation angle was more obtuse in cases with DA-PS compared to cases without DA-PS (117° ± 17° vs 79° ± 17°, P < 0.001), and an angle of > 100°, the preoperative cut-off observed previously in affected newborns, had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 88%, 79%, 82% and 85%, respectively. The receiver-operating-characteristics curve revealed an angle of ≥ 105° to have a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, for prenatal prediction of DA-PS. The presence of one or both features (inability to image in the same plane and the posterior bifurcation angle of ≥ 105°) had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 100%, 93%, 95% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An inability to visualize the branch PAs in the same plane, associated with abnormal insertion of the DA in most cases, and/or the presence of a posterior PA bifurcation angle of ≥ 105° are predictive features of postnatal DA-PS in fetuses with PAtr. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207