Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Newly recognized gold-rich sedimentary-exhalative (sedex) mineralization in Nevada, with an average gold grade of 14 g/tonne (t), and the occurrence of significant amounts of gold in classic sedex deposits like Rammelsberg, Germany (30 Mt at 1 g/t), Anvil, Canada (120 Mt at 0.7 g/t), and Triumph, Idaho (? at 2.2 g/t) demonstrate that basin brines can form gold ore. The sedex Au mineralization in Nevada represents a previously unrecognized end member in a spectrum of sedex deposits that also includes large Zn-Pb, intermediate Zn-Pb-Ba ± Au, and barite deposits. Study of ore deposits, modern brines, and chemical modeling indicates that variation in metal ratios and their abundance in sedex deposits are dominantly controlled by the concentration and redox state of sulfur in brines. For example, Au and Ba solubilities are highest in H2S-rich, SO4-poor fluids, whereas base metal solubilities are highest when H2S is not present. Chemical modeling indicates a typical reduced brine (15 wt % NaCl equiv, pH = 5.5, H2S = 0.01 m) at 200°C is capable of transporting as much as 1 ppm Au in solution. The H2S content in brines is controlled by the rate of its production through thermochemical reduction of sulfate by organic matter and the rate of its removal from the fluid through the sulfidation of reactive Fe in the sediments. Thus, sedimentary basins with high organic carbon and sulfate in rocks low in reactive Fe, such as carbonates and shales, are most likely to produce H2S-rich brines that may form gold-rich sedex deposits. Because of the tremendous scale of sedex hydrothermal systems, evidence that basin fluids can transport gold identifies a new mechanism for concentrating gold in sedimentary basins and opens extensive areas to further gold exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".