SAFETY OF PATIENTS AND MEDICAL STAFF IN CURRICULA AND TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS IN UKRAINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim: The Canada and Poland experience in the educational field in the practical implementation of international practices for the prevention of patient safety incidents is significant, taking into consideration the effectiveness of health care models. We have to analyze the documents on the training of medical professionals in terms of safety as a first step in introducing into the domestic (Ukrainian) medical educational practice of existing international experience in teaching patient safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The research was based on international documents on patient safety, thematic scientific publications, plans, and programs for the training of medical professionals in Ukraine. Bibliosemantic, systems analysis, mathematical (relative values) research methods were used in the study. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The analysis of thematic plans of separate disciplines in "Nursing" specialty has shown, that according to experts, questions of safety of patients should contain more than in 70% of subjects; on the topics of classes safety issues are provided in the range from 45.1% (basics of nursing) to 0.0% (anesthesiology and resuscitation); the actual content of educational and methodical materials was from 14.6% (basics of nursing) to 0.0% (anesthesiology and resuscitation). The time allotted to study disciplines related to occupational safety and health of health workers (life safety, basics of bioethics and biosafety, as well as occupational safety in the industry) is six times higher than the hours of study of the discipline (medical law) related to patient safety in the Working Curriculum (second (master's) level of higher education in the field of knowledge 22 "health" specialty 222 "medicine"). As a result of the analysis of work programs of educational disciplines at all levels of medical specialists training, a sharp discrepancy in the new information support of the educational process was revealed in terms of patient safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".