MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3116443862 · doi:10.5564/jis.v2i111.1444

Mongolia and Сanada relationship :

2020· article· en· W3116443862 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ulambayar Denzenlkham

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPolitical scienceState (computer science)DemocracyChinaDe factoGovernorPoliticsGeographyStrategic partnershipPublic administrationLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the relationship between Mongolia and Canada Mongolia’s “third neighbor”, key partner, and member of G7, G20, NATO, APEC. Canada recognized Mongolia in 1964 de facto and two parties established diplomatic relations on November 30, 1973 de jure. Canada has been one of the strong supporters of the democratic processes and market economic changes that began in Mongolia in the early 1990’s. Mongolia opened its Embassy to Canada in Ottawa in December 2001, and the Embassy of Canada to Mongolia was opened in Ulaanbaatar in September 2008. The two countries are in close cooperation in political, trade and economic, developmental, education and defense spheres and particularly in mining sector. Legal framework of Mongolia and Canada Expanded Partnership was established in October 2004. Right Honorable Mr. David Johnston, Governor General of Canada, paid a state visit to Mongolia on October 2013, which was of a significant importance. During the visit of Geoff Regan, Speaker of the House of Commons of Canada in September 2016 in Mongolia it was agreed to step up level of bilateral relations into extended partnership towards comprehensive partnership. Монгол-Канадын харилцаа, хамтын ажиллагаа: Өргөн хүрээтэй түншлэлээс иж бүрэн түншлэлийн зүгт Хураангуй: Энэхүү өгүүлэлд Монгол Улсын “гуравдагч хөрш”, чухаг түнш, Долоогийн бүлэг, 20-ийн бүлэг, НАТО болон АПЕК-ийн гишүүн Канад ба Монгол Улсын харилцаа, хамтын ажиллагааны тухай өгүүлнэ. Монгол, Канад нь 1973 оны 11 дүгээр сарын 30-нд дипломат харилцаа тогтоосон бөгөөд, Монгол Улс 2001 оны 12 дугаар сард Оттава хотноо, Канад улс 2008 онд Улаанбаатар хотноо ЭСЯ-аа харилцан нээсэн билээ. Канад нь 1990-ээд оны эхнээс Монгол Улсад өрнөсөн ардчилсан үйл явц, зах зээлийн эдийн засгийн өөрчлөлтийг идэвхтэй дэмжиж ирсэн юм. Хоёр талын хамтын ажиллагаа улс төр, худалдаа-эдийн засаг, хөгжлийн хамтын ажиллагаа, боловсрол, батлан хамгаалах салбарт ойр дөт хөгжиж байна. 2004 оны 10 дугаар сард Монгол, Канадын “Өргөн хүрээтэй түншлэл”-ийн эрхзүйн үндэс тавигдсан. 2013 оны 10 дугаар сард Канад улсын Амбан захирагч эрхэмсэг ноён Давид Жонстон Монголд айлчилсан нь чухал ач холбогдолтой болов. 2016 оны 9 дүгээр сард Канадын парламентын Нийтийн танхимын дарга Жиофф Реган Монголд айлчлах үеэр хоёр талын “өргөн хүртээтэй түншлэл”- ийг “иж бүрэн түншлэл”-ийн түвшинд шат ахиулах талаар санал нэгдсэн болно. Түлхүүр үгс: дипломат харилцаа, хамтын ажиллагаа, өргөн хүрээтэй түншлэл, “гуравдагч хөрш”, хэлэлцээр, айлчилал, элчин сайдын яам, найрсаг харилцаа, тунхаглал, иж бүрэн түншлэл.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Studies→Same topicChina's Ethnic Minorities and Relations→French-language works237,207→