MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116542223 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.30.424879

Cheese or cheese infusions – ecological traps for mosquitoes and spotted wing Drosophila

2020· preprint· en· W3116542223 on OpenAlex
Daniel A.H. Peach, Max Almond, Elton Ko, Sanam Meraj, Regine Gries, Gerhard Gries

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyLarvaAedes aegyptiAttractionPopulationAttractivenessEcological trapZoologyMosquito controlEcologyToxicologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We tested the hypothesis that the “ecological trap” phenomenon (a mismatch between a habitat’s perceived attractiveness and its actual quality, resulting in a population sink) is exploitable for pest control. We selected mosquitoes as modal organisms, because selection of an oviposition site by adult female mosquitoes in response to its perceived attractiveness is of paramount importance for the development and survival of their larval offspring. In laboratory and/or field experiments, we show that ( i ) each of five cheese varieties tested (Raclette, Pecorino, Brie, Gruyere, Limburger) strongly attracts females of both the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti , and the common house mosquito, Cx. pipiens; ( ii ) cheese infusions, or headspace odorant extracts (HOEs) of cheese infusions, significantly affect oviposition choices by Cx. pipiens and Ae. aegypti , ( iii ) HOEs contain at least 13 odorants; ( iv ) in field settings, cheese infusions more effectively stimulate oviposition by Cx. pipiens and Culiseta incidens than bluegrass ( Poa sp.) infusions, and also capture (by drowning) the spotted wing Drosophila (SWD); ( v ) the microbe composition of home-made cheese infusions modulates oviposition choices by mosquitoes; and ( vi ) the type of cheese infusion coupled with its nutritional content strongly affects the survivorship of mosquito larvae. In combination, our data show that microbial metabolites associated with cheese and cheese infusions are both attractive to adult mosquitoes seeking hosts and oviposition sites, respectively, and are toxic to mosquito larvae. These microbes and their metabolites could thus be coopted for both the attract and the kill function of “attract & kill” mosquito control tactics. Implementation of customizable and non-conventional nutritional media, such as home-made cheese infusions, as microbe-based ecological traps presents a promising concept which exploits insect ecology for insect control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentalhigh
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it