Review of transapical off-pump mitral valve intervention with NeoChord implantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mitral valve repair surgery has recently shifted from resection-based techniques to leaflet sparing approaches using synthetic neochordae. This has facilitated the growth of a new strategy of transapical off-pump mitral valve intervention with neochord implantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Minimally invasive approaches for mitral valve repair with robotic or video-assisted mini-right anterolateral thoracotomy have been developed to mitigate the morbidity associated with conventional median sternotomy. Recently, an alternative, less invasive surgical strategy has emerged. This transapical off-pump technique employs the NeoChord DS1000 (NeoChord, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) system to achieve repair with neochordae via a left minithoracotomy incision. With appropriate patient selection, advanced cardiac imaging, and training in device deployment are important for procedural success. SUMMARY: Early results suggest that transapical off-pump mitral valve intervention with NeoChord implantation is a safe procedure with favorable outcomes for select patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. Continued experience and clinical trials will assess the potential of this minimally invasive strategy, but this technique is likely to become part of the surgical repertoire for managing chronic degenerative mitral valve disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".