MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Beyond MRI: on the scientific value of combining non-human primate neuroimaging with metadata

2021· article· en· W3116867234 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Colline Poirier, Suliann Ben Hamed, Pamela García-Saldivar, Sze Chai Kwok, Adrien Meguerditchian, Hugo Merchant, Jeffrey Rogers, Sara Wells, Andrew S. Fox

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCalifornia National Primate Research CenterEuropean Research CouncilCentre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMedical Research CouncilH2020 European Research CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Institute of Mental HealthScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in ResearchEuropean CommissionNational Institutes of HealthNewcastle University
KeywordsNeuroimagingMetadataPoolingNon human primateComputer sciencePrimateFunctional neuroimagingData sharingData scienceNeuroscienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyBiologyEvolutionary biologyMedicineWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sharing and pooling large amounts of non-human primate neuroimaging data offer new exciting opportunities to understand the primate brain. The potential of big data in non-human primate neuroimaging could however be tremendously enhanced by combining such neuroimaging data with other types of information. Here we describe metadata that have been identified as particularly valuable by the non-human primate neuroimaging community, including behavioural, genetic, physiological and phylogenetic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.070
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.232
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0700.232
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0150.015
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0140.048
Open science0.0030.013
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→