MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116879415 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02603028mtgabs

Electrochemical Investigation of (De-)Lithiation Behaviors of Al Anodes and the Solubility Range of β-Lial Phase at Room Temperature

2020· article· en· W3116879415 on OpenAlexaff
Tianye Zheng, Dominik Kramer, Mohammad H. Tahmasebi, Holger Geßwein, Reiner Mönig, Steven T. Boles

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeSolubilityMaterials scienceElectrochemistryAlloyPhase (matter)Lithium (medication)Phase diagramChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetallurgyElectrodeChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alloy anodes have been extensively studied over past decades to replace the graphite of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Most efforts are made towards those anode materials with high specific capacities such as silicon and germanium. To minimize the negative impacts of the volume expansions during Li incorporation, protective coatings or specific micro- and nanostructures have been suggested, but a commercialization on a larger scale was impeded by such preparation costly procedures. Therefore, the optimal alloy anode candidate should balance the cost, capacity and manufacturing complexity rather than solely maximize the specific capacity. Aluminum, an underappreciated anode material, possesses intrinsic properties that fulfill the criteria mentioned above. The origin of the main capacity of aluminum anode is upon the formation of the β phase (LiAl; ca. 1Ah/g). However, the (de-)alloying processes of Al remain poorly understood, especially at room temperature under which LIBs usually operate. In this study, we investigate the (de-)lithiation that occurs within the solubility range of the β phase Although this Li solubility is highlighted by multiple versions of the Li-Al phase diagrams, the solubility range at low temperatures was not specified yet due to the experimental conditions of previous phase diagram studies (> 400 °C). Various electrochemical analytic tools and methods are used to shed light on the Li solubility within the β phase. The Li solubility range of the β phase is determined to be roughly 5 at% by a potentiostatic charge counting experiment at room temperature. Moreover, the cyclic voltammetry of partially lithiated Al foils shows that the β phase can be (de-)saturated without propagating the phase front towards the α phase. If galvanostatic charge and discharge is smartly controlled by taking into consideration of the solubility range, the cycling life of β-LiAl anode can be significantly improved. Not only does this piece of work provide fundamental data for the β-LiAl phase at room temperature that complements the existing phase diagrams, but also implies that aluminum foil holds great potential as an anode material for the next generation of lithium-based batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207