MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117236311 · doi:10.1080/15481603.2020.1857123

Microwave-based vegetation descriptors in the parameterization of water cloud model at L-band for soil moisture retrieval over croplands

2020· article· en· W3117236311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGIScience & Remote Sensing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceWater contentNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexSynthetic aperture radarVegetation (pathology)Enhanced vegetation indexRadarLeaf area indexSoil scienceVegetation IndexGeographyGeologyAgronomyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data have significant potential for soil moisture monitoring because of their high spatial resolution and independence from cloud coverage. However, it is challenging to retrieve soil moisture from SAR data over vegetated areas, as vegetation significantly affects backscattered radar signals. Auxiliary vegetation information obtained from optical images, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the leaf area index (LAI), is commonly used to correct vegetation effects. However, it is generally difficult to obtain SAR and optical data in the same area simultaneously, because of the discrepancies in satellite coverage and the effects of cloud coverage. This study focuses on whether vegetation descriptors obtained directly from radar data at L-band can adequately parameterize the semi-empirical backscattering water cloud model (WCM) to support soil moisture retrieval. Four vegetation descriptors (three based on radar images and one based on optical images), were chosen to assess the parameterization and calibration of the WCM and the retrieval accuracy of soil moisture. The results showed that the vegetation descriptor of backscattering at VH polarization outperformed the other three vegetation descriptors (NDVI-derived vegetation water content, radar vegetation index, and the ratio of cross-polarization to VV polarization) in the investigation of four crop types (canola, corn, bean, and wheat) based on the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment in 2012 (SMAPVEX12) in Canada. For the vegetation descriptor of VH, the overall accuracy of retrieved soil moisture was promising by separating into two growth stages, with unbiased root mean squared errors of 0.056, 0.053, 0.098, and 0.079 cm3/cm3 for canola, corn, bean, and wheat, respectively. The results also confirmed that variations in vegetation growth affect the accuracy of soil moisture retrieval. In addition, the retrieval performance was undermined when the vegetation changed dramatically, leading to variations or uncertainty in the vegetation structure. This study provides new insights into soil moisture retrieval methods with active L-band microwave observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it