MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117465043 · doi:10.1080/17538068.2020.1813525

Investigating language barriers in psychiatric care in Ghana

2020· article· en· W3117465043 on OpenAlex
Mercy Akrofi Ansah, Mercy Adzo Klugah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications In Healthcare · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpreterMental healthInterpersonal communicationLanguage barrierHealth careQualitative researchPsychiatryMedicineNursingPsychologySociologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In psychiatric care, doctors depend on information from interactions with patients to arrive at the right diagnosis and appropriate therapy (Brisset C, Leanza Y, Rosenberg E, Vissandjée B, Kirmayer LJ, Muckle G, et al. language barriers in mental health care: a survey of primary care practitioners. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(6):1238–46). This is a qualitative descriptive study which seeks to investigate language barriers faced by psychiatrists in their interactions with patients and the effectiveness of the strategies which are employed to deal with the barriers.Methods: Research questions are informed by Convergence (Giles H. Communication Accommodation Theory. In: Baxter LA, Braithewaite DO, editors. Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks ( CA): Sage Publications; 2008. p. 161–73). Using semi-structured interviews, psychiatric doctors from the three state-owned psychiatric hospitals in Ghana report their experiences with convergence strategies they use, and offer suggestions that could inform future studies and policy formulation with regard to psychiatric care in Ghana. A qualitative conventional content analysis was applied whereby coding categories were derived straight from the text data.Results: The literature suggests that the study is novel with reference to Ghana. Similar studies (Lee E. Cross-cultural communication: therapeutic use of interpreters in mental health for professionals and clinicians. In: Lee E, editor. Working with Asian Americans: a guide for clinicians. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 1997; Swartz L, Drennan G. Beyond Words: notes on the ‘irrelevance’ of language to mental health services in South Africa. Transcult Psychiatry. 2000;37(2):185–201; Jarvis GE, Ahmed R, Ryder A, Kirmayer LJ. Assessing language barriers to mental health services in a multiethnic population: preliminary findings. Presentation at Health care Access for Linguistic Minorities: Breaking the Barriers. Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 2014) corroborate this paper’s findings that language barriers have the potential of causing misdiagnoses if psychiatrists do not employ effective communication strategies.Conclusions: The paper recommends areas for further research and improvement measures which carry policy implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it