MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117578851 · doi:10.1115/omae2020-18077

Experiments on Fluid Placement in a Confined Pipe: Fluid Mechanics Analysis for Plug and Abandonment Applications

2020· article· en· W3117578851 on OpenAlexaff
Soheil Akbari, Seyed Mohammad Taghavi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpark plugAnnulus (botany)Drilling fluidPlug flowPetroleum engineeringUnderbalanced drillingMechanicsSlurryInflowViscosityFluid mechanicsGeotechnical engineeringGeologyNon-Newtonian fluidFluid dynamicsLost circulationNewtonian fluidFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceDrillingEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plug and abandonment (P&A) of oil and gas wells is an essential process to prevent the oil and gas reservoir fluids migration over time and possibly contaminating other formations and also fresh water resources. In order to plug and abandon a well, a high quality cement plug placement is required. One of the most common methods of cement plug placement is the dump bailing method. In this method, a fixed volume of cement is dumped using a bailer on a mechanical plug in the wellbore. The cement slurry occupies the wellbore and also the annular region outside the dump bailer. In the processes of cement slurry placement, an extensive range of Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluids is used to remove the in-situ fluid (drilling fluid or water) in the wellbore. Based on the large number of parameters such as the density and viscosity differences between the fluids, the geometry type (pipe, annulus, etc.), the operation conditions (velocity, geometry inclination, dumping height), various kinds of placement and mixing flows can occur, and different flow regimes (e.g. inertial, viscous) can develop. In this paper, we experimentally study the placement of a heavy fluid to replace an in-situ light fluid in an inclined closed-end pipe (representative of the dump bailing method). The two fluids are Newtonian and miscible, and they have the same viscosity. We investigate the effects of some of the flow parameters such as the dumping height, the pipe inclination, and the inflow velocity of the heavy fluid on the degree of mixing and the placement quality and efficiency. Our results show that the the most efficient displacement happens with the shortest dumping height and at lower inclination from vertical. Also, a high inflow velocity displaces the light fluid promptly with more mixing in comparison with a low inflow rate. The results can help us to develop strategies for improving the dump bailing method in the P&A of the oil and gas wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207