La pensée critique et l’histoire nationale du Québec-Canada chez les futurs enseignants du secondaire : une étude exploratoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La pense critique et l'histoire nationale du Qubec-Canada chez les futurs enseignants du secondaire : une tude exploratoire Formation et profession 28(3), 2020 0 sum Apprendre son histoire par la discussion est une voie privilgie. Dans un contexte de formation universitaire de futurs enseignants au baccalaurat en enseignement secondaire qubcois, comment la pense critique peut-elle tre dveloppe chez les lves de 14 16 ans, dont ils seront bientt responsables dans le cadre du cours d'histoire du Qubec et du Canada ? Comment les fondements disciplinaires et les possibilits didactiques de cette histoire peuvent-ils tre aliments ou encore nourrir eux-mmes le dveloppement de la pense critique ? De plus, l'histoire est une discipline hermneutique. Or, celui ou celle qui s'interroge sur le pass le fait partir de son inscription dans le prsent. Ainsi, quelle tradition interprtative notre enseignement de l'histoire renvoie-t-il ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".