MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117958234 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30298-9

Health and economic impact of air pollution in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2020· article· en· W3117958234 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anamika Pandey, Michael Bräuer, Maureen Cropper, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Prashant Mathur, Sagnik Dey, Burak Turkgulu, G Anil Kumar, Mukesh Khare, Gufran Beig, Tarun Gupta, Rinu P Krishnankutty, Kate Causey, Aaron J. Cohen, Stuti Bhargava, Ashutosh N. Aggarwal, Anurag Agrawal, Shally Awasthi, Fiona B Bennitt, Sadhana Bhagwat, P. Bhanumati, Katrin Burkart, Joy Kumar Chakma, Thomas C. Chiles, Sourangsu Chowdhury, Devasahayam Jesudas Christopher, Subhojit Dey, Samantha Fisher, Barbara M. Fraumeni, Richard Fuller, Aloke Gopal Ghoshal, Mahaveer Golechha, Prakash C. Gupta, Rachita Gupta, Rajeev Gupta, Shreekant Gupta, Sarath Guttikunda, David Hanrahan, S Harikrishnan, Panniyammakal Jeemon, Tushar Kant Joshi, Rajni Kant, Surya Kant, Tanvir Kaur, Parvaiz A Koul, Praveen Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Samantha Leigh Larson, Rakesh Lodha, Kishore K Madhipatla, P A Mahesh, Ridhima Malhotra, Shunsuke Managi, Keith Martin, Matthews Mathai, Joseph L. Mathew, Ravi Mehrotra, Viswanathan Mohan, Satinath Mukhopadhyay, Parul Mutreja, Nitish Naik, Sanjeev Nair, Jeyaraj Pandian, Pallavi Pant, Arokiasamy Perianayagam, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Poornima Prabhakaran, Goura Kishor Rath, Shamika Ravi, Ambuj Roy, Yogesh Sabde, Sundeep Salvi, Sankar Sambandam, Bhavay Sharma, Meenakshi Sharma, S. Sharma, R S Sharma, Aakash Shrivastava, Sujeet Kumar Singh, Virendra Singh, Rodney B.W. Smith, Jeffrey D Stanaway, Gabrielle Taghian, Nikhil Tandon, JS Thakur, Nihal Thomas, Gurudayal Singh Toteja, Chris M Varghese, Chandra Venkataraman, Krishnan N Venugopal, Katherine Walker, Stefanie Watson, Sarah Wozniak, Denis Xavier, Gautam N. Yadama, Geetika Yadav, Deeksha Shukla, Hendrik J Bekedam, K. Srinath Reddy, Randeep Guleria, Theo Vos, Stephen S Lim, Rakhi Dandona, Sunil Kumar, Pushpam Kumar, Philip J. Landrigan, Lalit Dandona

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Institute of Tropical MeteorologyUniversity of Maryland School of Public HealthUniversity of Southern MaineIndian Institute of Technology DelhiAll-India Institute of Medical SciencesIndian Institute of Technology BombayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of FloridaMinistry of Health and Family WelfareUnited NationsChristian Medical College, VelloreHealth Effects InstituteMinistry of Earth SciencesCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, IndiaDepartment of Health Research, IndiaIndian Council of Medical ResearchSree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and TechnologyInstitute for Health Metrics and EvaluationIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversity of British ColumbiaWorld Health OrganizationWorld Resources InstituteUniversity of WashingtonBoston CollegeBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsAir pollutionPollutionParticulatesEnvironmental healthBurden of diseaseEnvironmental scienceParticulate pollutionYears of potential life lostEnvironmental protectionAir quality indexMedicineGeographyLife expectancyPopulationMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The association of air pollution with multiple adverse health outcomes is becoming well established, but its negative economic impact is less well appreciated. It is important to elucidate this impact for the states of India. METHODS: We estimated exposure to ambient particulate matter pollution, household air pollution, and ambient ozone pollution, and their attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years in every state of India as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019. We estimated the economic impact of air pollution as the cost of lost output due to premature deaths and morbidity attributable to air pollution for every state of India, using the cost-of-illness method. FINDINGS: 1·67 million (95% uncertainty interval 1·42-1·92) deaths were attributable to air pollution in India in 2019, accounting for 17·8% (15·8-19·5) of the total deaths in the country. The majority of these deaths were from ambient particulate matter pollution (0·98 million [0·77-1·19]) and household air pollution (0·61 million [0·39-0·86]). The death rate due to household air pollution decreased by 64·2% (52·2-74·2) from 1990 to 2019, while that due to ambient particulate matter pollution increased by 115·3% (28·3-344·4) and that due to ambient ozone pollution increased by 139·2% (96·5-195·8). Lost output from premature deaths and morbidity attributable to air pollution accounted for economic losses of US$28·8 billion (21·4-37·4) and $8·0 billion (5·9-10·3), respectively, in India in 2019. This total loss of $36·8 billion (27·4-47·7) was 1·36% of India's gross domestic product (GDP). The economic loss as a proportion of the state GDP varied 3·2 times between the states, ranging from 0·67% (0·47-0·91) to 2·15% (1·60-2·77), and was highest in the low per-capita GDP states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. Delhi had the highest per-capita economic loss due to air pollution, followed by Haryana in 2019, with 5·4 times variation across all states. INTERPRETATION: The high burden of death and disease due to air pollution and its associated substantial adverse economic impact from loss of output could impede India's aspiration to be a $5 trillion economy by 2024. Successful reduction of air pollution in India through state-specific strategies would lead to substantial benefits for both the health of the population and the economy. FUNDING: UN Environment Programme; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations708
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207