Impact of Data Transformation: An ECG Heartbeat Classification Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases continue to be a significant global health threat. The electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is a physiological signal that plays a major role in preventing severe and even fatal heart diseases. The purpose of this research is to explore a simple mathematical feature transformation that could be applied to ECG signal segments in order to improve the detection accuracy of heartbeats, which could facilitate automated heart disease diagnosis. Six different mathematical transformation methods were examined and analyzed using 10s-length ECG segments, which showed that a reciprocal transformation results in consistently better classification performance for normal vs. atrial fibrillation beats and normal vs. atrial premature beats, when compared to untransformed features. The second best data transformation in terms of heartbeat detection accuracy was the cubic transformation. Results showed that applying the logarithmic transformation, which is considered the go-to data transformation, was not optimal among the six data transformations. Using the optimal data transformation, the reciprocal, can lead to a 35.6% accuracy improvement. According to the overall comparison tested by different feature engineering methods, classifiers, and different dataset sizes, performance improvement also reached 4.7%. Therefore, adding a simple data transformation step, such as the reciprocal or cubic, to the extracted features can improve current automated heartbeat classification in a timely manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".