Kelvin probe force microscopy to study electrostatic interactions of DNA with lipid–gemini surfactant monolayers for gene delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In novel gene therapy mechanisms utilising gemini surfactants, electrostatic interactions of the surfactant molecules with the DNA strands is a primary mechanism by which the two components of the delivery vehicle bind. In this work, we show for the first time direct evidence of electrostatic interactions of these compounds visualised with Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) and correlated to their topography from atomic force microscopy (AFM). We construct monolayers of lipids and gemini surfactant to simulate interactions on a cellular level, using lipids commonly found in cell membranes, and allow DNA to bind to the monolayer as it is formed on a Langmuir-Blodgett trough. The difference in topography and electrical surface potential between monolayers with and without DNA is striking. In fact, KPFM reveals a strongly positive relative electrical surface potential in between where we identify a background lipid and the DNA strands, evidenced by the height profiles of the domains. Such identification is not possible without KPFM. We conclude that it is likely we are seeing cationic surfactant molecules surrounding DNA strands within a sea of background lipid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".