Spectroscopy of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cd</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>99</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>In</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>101</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math> decays of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>In</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>99</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Sn</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>101</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on new $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray spectroscopy results from $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decays of $^{99}\mathrm{In}$ and $^{101}\mathrm{Sn}$. 30 new $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays were observed following the $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay of $^{99}\mathrm{In}$, and inconsistencies in the literature with respect to the $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays following the $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay of $^{101}\mathrm{Sn}$ were addressed with two confirmed cases and two new transitions. The experimental $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray energies, intensities, and coincidence relationships are discussed with shell model calculations, where theoretical $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay branching ratios from the parent nuclei and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray cascades of excited states from the daughter nuclei were combined to generate hypothetical $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ spectra and $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ coincidence matrices. The most intense $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray branches in both $^{99}\mathrm{Cd}$ and $^{101}\mathrm{In}$ were well reproduced with this approach, and several $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays were assigned to new excited states based on their good agreement with shell model predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.314 | 0.309 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".