MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118391121 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.022003

Measurements of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode polarization and temperature-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data

2021· article· en· W3118391121 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P. A. R. Ade, Zeeshan Ahmed, Ethan Anderes, A. J. Anderson, M. Archipley, J. S. Avva, K. Aylor, P. S. Barry, R. Basu Thakur, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, Lincoln Bryant, K. Byrum, J. E. Carlstrom, F. W. Carter, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, G. Chen, H.-M. Cho, T.-L. Chou, Jean-François Cliche, T. M. Crawford, A. Cukierman, C. Daley, T. de Haan, E. V. Denison, K. R. Dibert, J. Ding, M. Dobbs, W. Everett, C. Feng, K. R. Ferguson, A. Foster, J. Fu, S. Galli, A.E Gambrel, R. W. Gardner, N. Goeckner-Wald, R. Gualtieri, S. Guns, N. Gupta, R. Guyser, N. W. Halverson, A. H. Harke-Hosemann, N. L. Harrington, J. W. Henning, Gene C. Hilton, E. Hivon, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. C. Hood, D. Howe, N. Huang, K. D. Irwin, O. B. Jeong, M. Jonas, A. Jones, T. S. Khaire, L. Knox, Anna M. Kofman, M. Korman, D. L. Kubik, S. Kuhlmann, C.-L. Kuo, A. T. Lee, E. M. Leitch, A. E. Lowitz, C. Lu, S. S. Meyer, D. Michalik, M. Millea, J. Montgomery, A. Nadolski, T. Natoli, H. Nguyen, G. I. Noble, V. Novosad, Y. Omori, S. Padin, Z. Pan, P. Paschos, John E. Pearson, C. M. Posada, K. Prabhu, Wei Quan, S. Raghunathan, A. Rahlin, C. L. Reichardt, D. Riebel, Benedikt Riedel, M. Rouble, J. E. Ruhl, J. T. Sayre, E. Schiappucci, E. Shirokoff, G. Smecher, J. A. Sobrin, A. A. Stark, J. Stephen, K. T. Story, A. Suzuki, K. L. Thompson, B. Thorne, C. Tucker, C. Umiltà, L. R. Vale, K. Vanderlinde, J. D. Vieira, G. Wang, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, V. Yefremenko, K. W. Yoon, M. R. Young

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoThree-Speed Logic (Canada)Canadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcGill University
FundersFermilabHigh Energy PhysicsAustralian Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoUniversity of Colorado BoulderOffice of ScienceFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversity of MelbourneNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterMcGill UniversityUniversity of ChicagoCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchKavli FoundationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present measurements of the $E$-mode ($EE$) polarization power spectrum and temperature-$E$-mode ($TE$) cross-power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background using data collected by SPT-3G, the latest instrument installed on the South Pole Telescope. This analysis uses observations of a $1500\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{deg}}^{2}$ region at 95, 150, and 220 GHz taken over a four-month period in 2018. We report binned values of the $EE$ and $TE$ power spectra over the angular multipole range $300\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\ell}<3000$, using the multifrequency data to construct six semi-independent estimates of each power spectrum and their minimum-variance combination. These measurements improve upon the previous results of SPTpol across the multipole ranges $300\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremath{\le}1400$ for $EE$ and $300\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremath{\le}1700$ for $TE$, resulting in constraints on cosmological parameters comparable to those from other current leading ground-based experiments. We find that the SPT-3G data set is well fit by a $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmological model with parameter constraints consistent with those from Planck and SPTpol data. From SPT-3G data alone, we find ${H}_{0}=68.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.5\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}\text{ }{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}=0.789\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.016$, with a gravitational lensing amplitude consistent with the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ prediction (${A}_{L}=0.98\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.12$). We combine the SPT-3G and the Planck data sets and obtain joint constraints on the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ model. The volume of the 68% confidence region in six-dimensional $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ parameter space is reduced by a factor of 1.5 compared to Planck-only constraints, with no significant shifts in central values. We note that the results presented here are obtained from data collected during just half of a typical observing season with only part of the focal plane operable, and that the active detector count has since nearly doubled for observations made with SPT-3G after 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations262
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207