Statin Exposure and Risk of Heart Failure After Anthracycline‐ or Trastuzumab‐Based Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score‒Matched Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Statins are hypothesized to reduce the risk of cardiotoxicity associated with anthracyclines and trastuzumab. Our aim was to study the association of statin exposure with hospitalization or emergency department visits (hospital presentations) for heart failure (HF) after anthracycline‐ and/or trastuzumab‐containing chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Methods and Results Using linked administrative databases, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of women aged ≥66 years without prior HF who received anthracyclines or trastuzumab for newly diagnosed early breast cancer in Ontario between 2007 to 2017. Statin‐exposed and unexposed women were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. Trastuzumab‐treated women were also matched on anthracycline exposure. We matched 666 statin‐discordant pairs of anthracycline‐treated women and 390 pairs of trastuzumab‐treated women (median age, 69 and 71 years, respectively). The 5‐year cumulative incidence of HF hospital presentations after anthracyclines was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.5%–2.6%) in statin‐exposed women and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.7%–4.6%) in unexposed women ( P value, 0.01). The cause‐specific hazard ratio associated with statins in the anthracycline cohort was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.24–0.85; P value, 0.01). After trastuzumab, the 5‐year cumulative incidence of HF hospital presentations was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.2%–5.2%) in statin‐exposed women and 3.7% (95% CI, 2.0%–6.2%) in unexposed women ( P value 0.09). The cause‐specific hazard ratio associated with statins in the trastuzumab cohort was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.20–1.07; P value, 0.07). Conclusions Statin‐exposed women had a lower risk of HF hospital presentations after early breast cancer chemotherapy involving anthracyclines, with non‐significant trends towards lower risk following trastuzumab. These findings support the development of randomized controlled trials of statins for prevention of cardiotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".