Outcomes of nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in medically unwell patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly has a high rate of complications, including wound breakdown and fixation failure. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of nonsurgical management of displaced olecranon fractures in low-demand elderly and medically unwell patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 28 patients with displaced closed olecranon fractures was performed with an average follow-up of 11 months. The mean age at the time of injury was 79 ± 10 years. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6.4 ± 2.6. Treatment modalities were at the discretion of the treating surgeon. A sling alone was used in 3 cases, an extension circumferential cast in 9, or a plaster or thermoplastic splint in 16. The mean period of immobilization was 5 ± 1 weeks. Outcomes included range of motion, ability to perform active overhead extension, as well as radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean elbow range of motion for the cohort was from 28° ± 21° extension to 127° ± 15° flexion. Active overhead elbow extension against gravity was noted or documented in 24 (86%) patients. Two patients (7%) were unable to perform active extension. No pain was noted in 18 elbows, severe pain was present in 1 elbow, and the remainder reported mild occasional pain. All olecranon fractures in this cohort were displaced on the initial lateral radiograph. The mean displacement was 11 ± 7 mm. Nonunion at final radiographic outcome was observed in 23 (82%) elbows. Two (7%) patients developed skin complications related to posteriorly placed splints; one of which was severe. DISCUSSION: This study adds to the growing literature that supports nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in elderly and medically unwell patients with low upper extremity demand. Patients can be counseled that they have a good chance of obtaining overhead extension, with minimal pain. Posteriorly based splints should not be used to minimize skin complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".