MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118546173 · doi:10.1159/000511100

Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy following Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus and Steroid-Related Intraocular Pressure Spike

2021· article· en· W3118546173 on OpenAlexaff
Po Hsiang Yuan, Jonathan A. Micieli

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoKensington HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyMedicineOphthalmologyIntraocular pressureOptic neuropathyContext (archaeology)UveitisHerpes Zoster OphthalmicusOptic neuritisGlaucomaOptic nerveSurgeryMultiple sclerosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 61-year-old woman presented with sudden vision loss from a left anterior optic neuropathy in the context of severely elevated intraocular pressure after starting topical steroids for anterior uveitis related to herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). The strong temporal relationship between the vision loss and elevated IOP suggested the vision loss was related to nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Anterior chamber paracentesis did not detect varicella zoster virus (VZV) and magnetic resonance imaging of the orbits was normal. Her vision remained stable and the optic disc edema resolved within 3 months. The occurrence of NAION following an acute elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) is well-documented in the context of surgical procedures, glaucoma, uveitis and trauma. This case indicates that not every optic neuropathy in close temporal relationship with HZO is directly attributable to the virus. NAION may also occur after steroid-related IOP spikes and ophthalmologists should ensure that patients on topical steroids are closely monitored for ocular complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in OphthalmologySame topicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207