Photoinhibition in optically thick samples: Effects of light attenuation on chlorophyll fluorescence-based parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxygenic photoautotrophs are, paradoxically, subject to photoinhibition of their photosynthetic apparatus, in particular one of its major components, the Photosystem II (PSII). Photoinhibition is generalized across species, light conditions and habitats, imposing substantial metabolic costs that lower photosynthetic productivity and constrain the niches of photoautotrophy. As a process driven by light reaching PSII, light attenuation in optically thick samples influences both the actual extent, and the detection, of photoinhibition. Chlorophyll fluorescence is widely used to measure photoinhibition, but fluorescence-based parameters are affected by light attenuation of both downwelling incident radiation traversing the sample to reach PSII, and emitted fluorescence upwelling through the sample. We used modelling, experimental manipulation of within-sample light attenuation, and meta-analysis of published data, to show substantial, differential effects of light attenuation and depth-integration of emitted fluorescence upon measurements of photoinhibition. Numerical simulations and experimental manipulation of light attenuation indicated that PSII photoinactivation tracked using chlorophyll fluorescence can appear to be over three times lower than the inherent cellular susceptibility to photoinactivation, in optically-dense samples such as leaves or biofilms. The meta-analysis of published data showed that this general trend was unknowingly present in the literature, revealing an overall difference of more than five times between optically thick leaves and optically thin cell suspensions. Although fluorescence-based parameters may provide ecophysiologically relevant information for characterizing the sample as a whole, light attenuation and depth integration can vary between samples independently of their intrinsic physiology. They should be used with caution when aiming to quantify in absolute terms inherent photoinhibition-related parameters in optically thick samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".