MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 14567: Detection of Acute Cellular Rejection in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: A Pilot Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

2015· article· en· W3118608845 on OpenAlexaff
Steven C. Greenway, Frédéric Dallaire, Paul F. Kantor, Anne I. Dipchand, Rajiv Chaturvedi, Monali Warade, Eugénie Riesenkampff, Shi‐Joon Yoo, Lars Grosse‐Wortmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenStollery Children's HospitalUniversité de SherbrookeAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCardiac magnetic resonanceTransplantationHeart transplantationCardiac magnetic resonance imagingCardiologyInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The diagnosis of significant acute cellular rejection (ACR) after heart transplantation (HT) prompts an immediate change in management and is associated with adverse outcome. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for the detection of ACR but has important limitations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as a non-invasive tool to detect ACR in pediatric patients after HT. Methods: In this single centre prospective cohort study, 30 pediatric HT recipients underwent CMR at the time of surveillance EMB. Their CMR results were compared to 14 non-HT pediatric controls. Ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, native T1 times and T2-weighted signal intensities were compared between patients and controls and between patients with (grade 2 R) and without (grade 0 R/1 R) significant ACR according to standard criteria. Extracellular volumes (ECV) and the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were compared between the two HT groups. Results: There were no significant demographic differences between the patient groups. Transplant patients were on average 11 ± 6.1 years of age and were 31.5 ± 41.3 months post-transplant. Significant (grade 2 R) ACR was an infrequent event in our population (5/30, 17%). Compared to controls, heart rate (100.3 ± 16.4 bpm) and brain natriuretic peptide (60.8 ± 100.7 ng/L) were significantly elevated post-HT but did not differentiate between grades of ACR. Ventricular volumes, ejection fractions, LGE prevalence, ECVs, native T1 times and T2 signal intensities were not significantly altered by ACR. Conclusions: We describe the myocardial characteristics of pediatric HT recipients by CMR. Although limited by the small number of patients with significant ACR the results of this pilot study suggest that current CMR imaging protocols are insufficient to reliably identify ACR-related changes in pediatric HT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→